“My research found that theological homogeneity within the presbyterate of a diocese did not predict unity. Rather, higher levels of unity and perceived mission vibrancy were strongly correlated with a bishop’s openness to engage theological diversity with transparency, consultation, and trust. Communion is strengthened not by eliminating differences, but by how leaders relate across them.”

Communion matters today because the Church’s credibility in a polarized culture depends upon it. When ideological divisions shape relationships within the Church, trust erodes and collaboration becomes difficult. In my ministry and work with the Catholic Common Ground Initiative, I have seen how polarization can strain relationships and dampen shared mission. At the same time, I have also witnessed how intentional practices of listening and bridge-building can restore trust and renew common purpose.

My doctoral research examined the relationship between a bishop and his presbyterate and its association with unity and mission vibrancy within a diocese. The findings did not show that theological diversity predicted division. Instead, there were strong positive correlations between priests’ perceptions of a bishop’s openness to theological diversity and their reported experience of unity and mission vibrancy. While correlational findings do not establish causation, they suggest that leadership behaviors—particularly openness, consultation, and transparent communication—are closely associated with stronger ecclesial communion.

The Communion Project embodies this conviction: that unity in diversity is possible when we commit to practices that build trust across differences. Building bridges is not a compromise of conviction; it is a Gospel imperative. If we can learn to engage our differences faithfully and relationally, the Church in the United States can more fully embody the communion it proclaims and offer a hopeful witness in a divided world.